Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-27 08:32:33 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Visa n'est qu'une partie du système de paiement. La consommation du réseau Visa ne prend pas en compte la consommation énergétique de la banque qui reçoit/envoie les fonds. https://hackernoon.com/the-bitcoin-vs-visa-electricity-consumption-fallacy-8cf194987a50

Written by 43668B9D9F99F9BD7B107C7148748865A37EF724279D739CDE7F5A0DB690E669
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1706905294087823462

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1706949936045027550
  • noteId - 1706949936045027550
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 43668B9D9F99F9BD7B107C7148748865A37EF724279D739CDE7F5A0DB690E669 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1695803553008
  • tweetId - 1706905294087823462
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Visa n'est qu'une partie du système de paiement. La consommation du réseau Visa ne prend pas en compte la consommation énergétique de la banque qui reçoit/envoie les fonds. https://hackernoon.com/the-bitcoin-vs-visa-electricity-consumption-fallacy-8cf194987a50

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-27 08:32:33 UTC
(1695803553008)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-28 02:41:07 UTC
(1695868867083)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-27 19:30:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 15:22:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 13:49:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 13:40:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 13:29:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 12:54:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 12:47:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 11:00:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 10:50:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 08:55:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 08:10:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 06:37:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 06:21:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 06:19:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:59:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:53:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:48:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:44:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:39:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:30:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:28:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:23:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:01:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 04:58:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 04:56:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 04:30:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 04:27:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 04:18:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 04:07:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 04:04:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 04:01:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 03:48:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 15:45:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 08:13:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 06:20:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 03:04:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 02:10:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 22:42:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 20:01:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 12:13:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-30 01:25:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 10:57:47 -0500 Rating Details