Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-27 07:11:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Ce post compare la consommation de Visa en 2019, avec celle de Bitcoin en 2022. Il faut comparer les consommation pour la même année. Ainsi, en 2019 Bitcoin à consommé environ 53 TWh et non pas 120TWh. https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption

Written by 3920EC39EE6C9D212D53FF3154603BF6F567FAA637CA7FA4C7CA6AFA81F647D6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1706905294087823462

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1706929596988289237
  • noteId - 1706929596988289237
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3920EC39EE6C9D212D53FF3154603BF6F567FAA637CA7FA4C7CA6AFA81F647D6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1695798703800
  • tweetId - 1706905294087823462
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Ce post compare la consommation de Visa en 2019, avec celle de Bitcoin en 2022. Il faut comparer les consommation pour la même année. Ainsi, en 2019 Bitcoin à consommé environ 53 TWh et non pas 120TWh. https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-27 07:11:43 UTC
(1695798703800)
2023-09-27 09:13:00 UTC
(1695805980062)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-09-28 02:41:07 UTC
(1695868867083)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2023-09-27 09:13:00 UTC
(1695805980062)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-27 19:30:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 15:22:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 13:41:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 13:29:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 12:47:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 11:00:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 09:03:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 08:12:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 07:32:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 06:35:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 05:26:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 04:06:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 03:48:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 03:42:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 03:16:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 03:13:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 02:50:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 02:44:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 02:35:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 02:32:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 02:19:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 02:13:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 15:45:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-28 06:18:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 22:43:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-27 20:02:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-29 12:13:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-30 01:26:21 -0500 Rating Details