Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-26 10:17:18 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

NNN Der erste Satz des Tweets stellt eine Tatsachenbehauptung dar, erkennbar am Indikativ (Sprache). Diese Behauptung ist in dieser Form falsch, CN 1 ist daher als Gegenbeweis legitim. Weitere Quellen: https://deutsches-schulportal.de/unterricht/schule-ohne-noten-neue-wege-der-leistungsbeurteilung/ https://scholar.google.de/scholar?start=10&q=noten+oder+feedback&hl=de&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1#d=gs_qabs&t=1695723371729&u=%23p%3D0oKtWdJbyOIJ

Written by EF010BA2339862DA0A53B174132126DC47DDB702AE846DB99C84BAFD9A46B273
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1706206543757111752

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1706613912819392635
  • noteId - 1706613912819392635
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - EF010BA2339862DA0A53B174132126DC47DDB702AE846DB99C84BAFD9A46B273 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1695723438825
  • tweetId - 1706206543757111752
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN Der erste Satz des Tweets stellt eine Tatsachenbehauptung dar, erkennbar am Indikativ (Sprache). Diese Behauptung ist in dieser Form falsch, CN 1 ist daher als Gegenbeweis legitim. Weitere Quellen: https://deutsches-schulportal.de/unterricht/schule-ohne-noten-neue-wege-der-leistungsbeurteilung/ https://scholar.google.de/scholar?start=10&q=noten+oder+feedback&hl=de&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1#d=gs_qabs&t=1695723371729&u=%23p%3D0oKtWdJbyOIJ

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-26 10:17:18 UTC
(1695723438825)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-27 02:10:44 UTC
(1695780644563)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-26 18:12:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-26 16:31:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-26 15:33:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-26 11:48:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-26 08:37:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-26 07:18:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-26 05:46:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-26 05:21:35 -0500 Rating Details