Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-26 00:10:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This presents an unverified claim as a fact. There is no evidence to confirm the OP's claim. https://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/taylor-swift-clone-of-a-famous-satanist-theory-3325 https://mashable.com/article/taylor-swift-satanist-clone-zeena-lavey (the tone of the article is sarcasm)

Written by C56CE012FC36F6F03000B45B5588BE3C750D3A944F1FAB1D6C54D69B893FF1B4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1706321396580655378

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1706461267584581820
  • noteId - 1706461267584581820
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C56CE012FC36F6F03000B45B5588BE3C750D3A944F1FAB1D6C54D69B893FF1B4 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1695687045370
  • tweetId - 1706321396580655378
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This presents an unverified claim as a fact. There is no evidence to confirm the OP's claim. https://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/taylor-swift-clone-of-a-famous-satanist-theory-3325 https://mashable.com/article/taylor-swift-satanist-clone-zeena-lavey (the tone of the article is sarcasm)

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-26 00:10:45 UTC
(1695687045370)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-26 02:11:34 UTC
(1695694294267)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-26 08:53:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-25 23:07:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-25 21:56:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-25 19:59:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-09 17:41:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-09 16:11:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-09 15:55:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-09 14:51:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-06 18:30:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 14:42:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 12:21:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 12:19:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 11:16:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 10:40:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 07:33:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 02:57:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 00:18:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 23:50:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 05:08:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 22:12:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 21:20:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 19:46:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 18:56:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 03:10:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 19:52:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-08 21:51:39 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-15 14:16:44 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 14:06:44 -0600 Rating Details