Birdwatch Note
2023-09-25 17:19:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There’s no evidence his phone was stolen. Putting the tweet out MIGHT be because of the backlash he got from posting his babies genitals.
Written by 00B1BD9822B5DF9F37F83467004EBCEDDED14E9D47C5F032DEC318004AC87CB7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1706322962901512526
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1706357770658910452
- noteId - 1706357770658910452
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 00B1BD9822B5DF9F37F83467004EBCEDDED14E9D47C5F032DEC318004AC87CB7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1695662369776
- tweetId - 1706322962901512526
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- There’s no evidence his phone was stolen. Putting the tweet out MIGHT be because of the backlash he got from posting his babies genitals.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-09-25 17:19:29 UTC (1695662369776) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-26 02:11:34 UTC (1695694294267) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-09-25 19:13:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 18:57:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 18:40:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 18:14:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 15:54:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 15:36:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 15:33:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 14:51:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 14:27:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 14:22:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 14:00:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 13:59:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 13:46:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 13:38:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 13:23:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 13:19:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 13:11:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 13:07:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 13:04:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 13:04:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:57:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:57:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:53:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:52:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:52:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:49:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:48:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:48:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:43:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:36:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:23:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 12:21:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-26 07:47:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-26 06:23:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-26 02:10:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-26 02:08:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-25 19:51:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 19:28:28 -0500 | Rating Details |