Birdwatch Note
2023-09-21 22:54:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
車のエンジンより火力発電所の発電効率の方が高い為、送電ロスを加味してもEVの方がエネルギー量に対する移動効率が高いとされています。 ・ガソリン車：16-25% ・EV：31% また、天然ガス発電であれば48%、水力発電であれば75%と発電方法によっては更に移動効率を高めることが出来ます。 https://gigazine.net/news/20220824-electric-vehicles-energy-efficient/
Written by D9C7AC9DFB73F34934C9192DBBC66E489638D685C69627C1A826F92D9DAA3970
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1704752311543996425
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1704992484861096285
- noteId - 1704992484861096285
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D9C7AC9DFB73F34934C9192DBBC66E489638D685C69627C1A826F92D9DAA3970 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1695336860276
- tweetId - 1704752311543996425
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 車のエンジンより火力発電所の発電効率の方が高い為、送電ロスを加味してもEVの方がエネルギー量に対する移動効率が高いとされています。 ・ガソリン車：16-25% ・EV：31% また、天然ガス発電であれば48%、水力発電であれば75%と発電方法によっては更に移動効率を高めることが出来ます。 https://gigazine.net/news/20220824-electric-vehicles-energy-efficient/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-09-21 22:54:20 UTC (1695336860276) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-22 02:10:20 UTC (1695348620059) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-09-21 19:13:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 18:15:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 18:14:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 18:07:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-22 12:44:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-22 07:10:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-22 06:52:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-22 01:59:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-22 00:40:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-22 00:38:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 23:56:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 23:20:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 23:11:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 22:45:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 22:36:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 22:25:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 22:25:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 22:18:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 21:58:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 21:48:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 21:46:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 21:34:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 21:20:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 21:01:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 19:41:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-23 07:00:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-11 07:10:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-27 17:21:54 -0600 | Rating Details |