Birdwatch Note
2023-09-21 16:39:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Brian is speculating as to how the pornographic website ended up on the packaging. Regardless of how it got there, the link did in fact take anyone that used it to a pornographic site. Libs of TikTok was factually accurate in their original tweet. https://www.gbnews.com/lifestyle/product-recall-lidl-paw-patrol-porn
Written by DB3BDCC923DFBA1039F073EAD45DEEEA921E25F534C5943EE919A71F43A8C5C5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1704891933099761764
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1704898148634865960
- noteId - 1704898148634865960
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DB3BDCC923DFBA1039F073EAD45DEEEA921E25F534C5943EE919A71F43A8C5C5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1695314368767
- tweetId - 1704891933099761764
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Brian is speculating as to how the pornographic website ended up on the packaging. Regardless of how it got there, the link did in fact take anyone that used it to a pornographic site. Libs of TikTok was factually accurate in their original tweet. https://www.gbnews.com/lifestyle/product-recall-lidl-paw-patrol-porn
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-09-21 16:39:28 UTC (1695314368767) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-22 02:10:20 UTC (1695348620059) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-09-21 17:47:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 17:34:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 16:35:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 15:29:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 15:27:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 15:19:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 14:46:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 14:33:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 13:50:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 13:45:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 13:35:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 13:02:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 12:52:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 12:29:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 12:29:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 12:22:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 12:20:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 12:15:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 12:14:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 12:02:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 12:00:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 12:00:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 11:44:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 11:43:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 11:42:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-22 02:57:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-22 01:22:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-21 18:40:20 -0500 | Rating Details |