Birdwatch Note
2023-09-21 00:03:14 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The voice amendment states that the Voice can make representations. It does not have any power. The make up and functioning of the Voice will be determined by parliament https://australiainstitute.org.au/post/leading-judges-support-the-voice/ https://nit.com.au/07-06-2023/6262/coalition-mps-slammed-for-misrepresenting-voice-perspectives-of-former-high-court-judges
Written by 8F546E7CCAF86FC04097D9A80AB779270141262AB882B85EA35D54F27C997465
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1704308544445808856
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1704647438634733656
- noteId - 1704647438634733656
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8F546E7CCAF86FC04097D9A80AB779270141262AB882B85EA35D54F27C997465 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1695254594845
- tweetId - 1704308544445808856
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The voice amendment states that the Voice can make representations. It does not have any power. The make up and functioning of the Voice will be determined by parliament https://australiainstitute.org.au/post/leading-judges-support-the-voice/ https://nit.com.au/07-06-2023/6262/coalition-mps-slammed-for-misrepresenting-voice-perspectives-of-former-high-court-judges
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-09-21 00:03:14 UTC (1695254594845) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-22 02:10:20 UTC (1695348620059) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-09-20 20:22:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-20 19:12:37 -0500 | Rating Details |