Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-20 23:17:11 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

As the former minister of two different departments, Poilievre would have received security clearances to review documents of his own department and to discuss and vote on issues at cabinet https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/yes-poilievre-can-get-a-security-clearance-he-already-has

Written by 5B3ECF0BEBC56E8D0475D4DF9D576EC77944F8B1C3277AE2FDB30DC1ED85C371
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1704510091716653468

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1704635849646743728
  • noteId - 1704635849646743728
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5B3ECF0BEBC56E8D0475D4DF9D576EC77944F8B1C3277AE2FDB30DC1ED85C371 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1695251831815
  • tweetId - 1704510091716653468
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • As the former minister of two different departments, Poilievre would have received security clearances to review documents of his own department and to discuss and vote on issues at cabinet https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/yes-poilievre-can-get-a-security-clearance-he-already-has

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-20 23:17:11 UTC
(1695251831815)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-21 03:39:50 UTC
(1695267590895)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-20 18:25:48 -0500 Rating Details