Birdwatch Note
2023-09-18 17:48:04 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Seria melhor NNN, a nota acima deixa confuso se seria para o tweet ou para o print.
Written by 44EF676882D40E96EA6CA1DE6D689E55F8C2D0282231E62F96E36EC5B50E4728
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1703478577830781364
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1703828248784674964
- noteId - 1703828248784674964
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 44EF676882D40E96EA6CA1DE6D689E55F8C2D0282231E62F96E36EC5B50E4728 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1695059284768
- tweetId - 1703478577830781364
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Seria melhor NNN, a nota acima deixa confuso se seria para o tweet ou para o print.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-09-18 17:48:04 UTC (1695059284768) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-21 03:39:50 UTC (1695267590895) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-09-18 19:39:39 -0500 | Rating Details |