Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-18 16:11:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Nel post vengono indicati 41 caccia di 4 generazione (da nessuna parte si è fatto questo numero). Si parla di circa 60 F-16 e probabilmente 20 Gripen. Ma non sono numeri definitivi. La russia ha 1000 aerei dall’inizio dell’invasione ma non è riuscita a imporre superiorità aerea

Written by D46D35CAE5C911586757EBA44EB608B281365D20D28EEB61DC748B84E43E6839
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1703408954678575122

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1703804067883917448
  • noteId - 1703804067883917448
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D46D35CAE5C911586757EBA44EB608B281365D20D28EEB61DC748B84E43E6839 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1695053519593
  • tweetId - 1703408954678575122
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Nel post vengono indicati 41 caccia di 4 generazione (da nessuna parte si è fatto questo numero). Si parla di circa 60 F-16 e probabilmente 20 Gripen. Ma non sono numeri definitivi. La russia ha 1000 aerei dall’inizio dell’invasione ma non è riuscita a imporre superiorità aerea

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-18 16:11:59 UTC
(1695053519593)
2023-09-19 03:11:35 UTC
(1695093095014)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-09-21 03:39:50 UTC
(1695267590895)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2023-09-19 03:11:35 UTC
(1695093095014)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-19 11:58:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 09:15:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 05:07:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 04:48:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 03:10:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 01:28:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 00:31:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 20:29:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 17:28:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 17:15:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 15:52:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 15:34:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 15:20:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 14:20:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 13:54:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 13:35:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 13:29:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 13:24:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 12:21:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 12:09:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-18 11:51:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-20 01:32:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 07:05:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 06:33:51 -0500 Rating Details