Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-18 08:27:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

El PSOE criticaba el machismo del uso condescendiente de la palabra "bonica" para dirigirse a una mujer. En el post de Ximo Puig está calificando de "bonica" a la gente de Petrer en general, por lo que no hay machismo.

Written by F13E7451D91B71E806235185F86D6D0B2C2967F17186FE5B69748C183264C357
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1703385612261216568

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1703687064661729657
  • noteId - 1703687064661729657
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F13E7451D91B71E806235185F86D6D0B2C2967F17186FE5B69748C183264C357 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1695025623846
  • tweetId - 1703385612261216568
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • El PSOE criticaba el machismo del uso condescendiente de la palabra "bonica" para dirigirse a una mujer. En el post de Ximo Puig está calificando de "bonica" a la gente de Petrer en general, por lo que no hay machismo.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-18 08:27:03 UTC
(1695025623846)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-21 03:39:50 UTC
(1695267590895)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-18 06:18:42 -0500 Rating Details