Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-17 08:59:39 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. The author concludes medical services were „insanely overpriced“. It’s his opinion. Replies belong to the comments section. The note nitpicking, it wasn‘t 66.5%, but a slightly different number of bankruptcies misses the key argument & belongs to comments too: https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343%2809%2900404-5/pdf https://www.thebalancemoney.com/medical-bankruptcy-statistics-4154729 https://files.kff.org/attachment/Report-KFF-LA-Times-Survey-of-Adults-with-Employer-Sponsored-Health-Insurance

Written by A82EE084963665A5F3FE61597A2026B6EE9ED3325DFBDA6EB6541F1FA68F923B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1702548397839012258

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1703332877939703823
  • noteId - 1703332877939703823
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A82EE084963665A5F3FE61597A2026B6EE9ED3325DFBDA6EB6541F1FA68F923B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1694941179153
  • tweetId - 1702548397839012258
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. The author concludes medical services were „insanely overpriced“. It’s his opinion. Replies belong to the comments section. The note nitpicking, it wasn‘t 66.5%, but a slightly different number of bankruptcies misses the key argument & belongs to comments too: https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343%2809%2900404-5/pdf https://www.thebalancemoney.com/medical-bankruptcy-statistics-4154729 https://files.kff.org/attachment/Report-KFF-LA-Times-Survey-of-Adults-with-Employer-Sponsored-Health-Insurance

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-17 08:59:39 UTC
(1694941179153)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-18 02:10:22 UTC
(1695003022291)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)