Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-17 07:30:52 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Le collectif "Nos services publics" a un parti pris puisqu'il est constitué de fonctionnaires, contractuels, agents de la sécurité sociale etc. https://nosservicespublics.fr/nous De plus sans axe des abscisses ni ordonnées, le graphique ne permet aucune vérification ni argumentation factuelle.

Written by DFC73A853AEDB3D56BCAA1EE7FE14F0E1C8DF59FFE91C7D47AC500FCC80F57D6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1702985640470557143

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1703310538363552084
  • noteId - 1703310538363552084
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - DFC73A853AEDB3D56BCAA1EE7FE14F0E1C8DF59FFE91C7D47AC500FCC80F57D6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1694935852981
  • tweetId - 1702985640470557143
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Le collectif "Nos services publics" a un parti pris puisqu'il est constitué de fonctionnaires, contractuels, agents de la sécurité sociale etc. https://nosservicespublics.fr/nous De plus sans axe des abscisses ni ordonnées, le graphique ne permet aucune vérification ni argumentation factuelle.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-17 07:30:52 UTC
(1694935852981)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-18 02:10:22 UTC
(1695003022291)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-17 12:00:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 06:53:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 06:23:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 04:55:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 04:47:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 04:12:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 03:48:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 03:33:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 03:29:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 03:19:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 03:08:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 02:56:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-19 09:32:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-21 08:36:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-24 16:20:07 -0500 Rating Details