Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-17 01:43:15 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is both untrue and an extraordinary breach of protocol regarding El Rey de España, Felipe VI. Even if there were such an empire (there isn't) El Rey has no legal grounds for such a claim, and has never made it. Before proceeding further, we await @josemaria4ever's response

Written by 69A6C09F9A6A010BD41F6B8C72EDC71EDD8399F960E70E92CC032DFC8CDCD4B6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1702765809448235370

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1703223055546245599
  • noteId - 1703223055546245599
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 69A6C09F9A6A010BD41F6B8C72EDC71EDD8399F960E70E92CC032DFC8CDCD4B6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1694914995454
  • tweetId - 1702765809448235370
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This is both untrue and an extraordinary breach of protocol regarding El Rey de España, Felipe VI. Even if there were such an empire (there isn't) El Rey has no legal grounds for such a claim, and has never made it. Before proceeding further, we await @josemaria4ever's response

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-17 01:43:15 UTC
(1694914995454)
2023-09-17 08:11:15 UTC
(1694938275512)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-09-18 02:10:22 UTC
(1695003022291)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-09-17 08:11:15 UTC
(1694938275512)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-17 15:36:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 08:31:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 03:30:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 03:25:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 03:03:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 02:36:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 02:24:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 02:16:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 01:21:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 00:58:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 00:01:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 23:29:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 23:22:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 22:43:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 21:07:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-25 05:07:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-25 09:04:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-24 22:54:11 -0500 Rating Details