Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-16 17:27:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The above note while 50% correct misses the point about profit sharing. 40% of the profit sharing would push the wages up. And frankly, fuck the UAW, 90% of their jobs are done or assisted by robotics, why the fuck should they make more than teachers or for that matter anybody?

Written by A5DF3D5D0A5112F24A03B6044A78362C7696222C4944FAF5470335E1D1767E2B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1702421619413807142

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1703098380149305467
  • noteId - 1703098380149305467
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A5DF3D5D0A5112F24A03B6044A78362C7696222C4944FAF5470335E1D1767E2B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1694885270525
  • tweetId - 1702421619413807142
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The above note while 50% correct misses the point about profit sharing. 40% of the profit sharing would push the wages up. And frankly, fuck the UAW, 90% of their jobs are done or assisted by robotics, why the fuck should they make more than teachers or for that matter anybody?

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-16 17:27:50 UTC
(1694885270525)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-17 01:38:29 UTC
(1694914709998)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-16 18:31:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 17:50:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 16:34:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 16:08:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 15:06:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 13:55:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 13:39:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 13:35:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 13:21:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 13:01:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 12:37:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 12:32:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-17 11:03:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 20:58:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-16 20:39:07 -0500 Rating Details