Birdwatch Note
2023-09-16 11:12:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
La información de El Diario es correcta. Menciona indultos donde fueron indultos, y amnistía para en casos de amnistía. No mezcla conceptos. Es reseñable destacar que tienen cosas en común, ya que en ambos casos son ejercicios del derecho de gracia de los poderes públicos. https://www.newtral.es/indulto-amnistia-que-es-significado-echo/20210201/
Written by 618C05F7580AA12DBF1766B2595AE73BE74E9C01173191B114195823AB282A69
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1702960387472117826
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1703004008254746912
- noteId - 1703004008254746912
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 618C05F7580AA12DBF1766B2595AE73BE74E9C01173191B114195823AB282A69 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1694862770506
- tweetId - 1702960387472117826
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- La información de El Diario es correcta. Menciona indultos donde fueron indultos, y amnistía para en casos de amnistía. No mezcla conceptos. Es reseñable destacar que tienen cosas en común, ya que en ambos casos son ejercicios del derecho de gracia de los poderes públicos. https://www.newtral.es/indulto-amnistia-que-es-significado-echo/20210201/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-09-16 11:12:50 UTC (1694862770506) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-17 01:38:29 UTC (1694914709998) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-09-16 18:02:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 16:23:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 15:50:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 15:33:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 15:33:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 13:56:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 12:26:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 11:37:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 10:04:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 08:06:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 07:12:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 06:50:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 06:43:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-17 03:12:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-17 02:06:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-16 23:15:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-18 13:40:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-18 09:45:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-18 02:30:41 -0500 | Rating Details |