Birdwatch Note
2023-09-14 22:54:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Es geht um Absenkung des Grunderwerbsteuersatzes auf das Niveau zB Bremens (SPD), was in ihrem Bereich des GrEStG auch die SPD-geführte BReg seit 2021 verspricht, nur erfolglos. Deswegen hat Thüringen keine andere Möglichkeit, das _gemeinsame_ Sachziel zu erreichen, Art 105 GG. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_105.html
Written by 80EC215D6B0F3EB42A62C5E74D0CBC11037D27F306A39CEEF9EAA30C45504DF3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1702380619462783134
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1702455844745458077
- noteId - 1702455844745458077
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 80EC215D6B0F3EB42A62C5E74D0CBC11037D27F306A39CEEF9EAA30C45504DF3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1694732078146
- tweetId - 1702380619462783134
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Es geht um Absenkung des Grunderwerbsteuersatzes auf das Niveau zB Bremens (SPD), was in ihrem Bereich des GrEStG auch die SPD-geführte BReg seit 2021 verspricht, nur erfolglos. Deswegen hat Thüringen keine andere Möglichkeit, das _gemeinsame_ Sachziel zu erreichen, Art 105 GG. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_105.html
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-09-14 22:54:38 UTC (1694732078146) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-15 01:40:54 UTC (1694742054714) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-09-15 09:10:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 05:29:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 05:21:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 04:44:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 04:23:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 02:40:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 01:54:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 01:38:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 01:31:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 01:13:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 01:07:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 00:59:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 00:58:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 00:32:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-14 23:52:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-14 23:21:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-14 21:21:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-09 09:15:20 -0500 | Rating Details |