Birdwatch Note
2023-09-13 18:19:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
L'article de Ouest-France ne donne la parole qu'aux anti- nucléaire ayant signé l'appel. Il serait bon de donner la parole aux pro. En quoi un Ingénieur forestier, un agronome, un sociologue ou un médecin, signataires de cet appel sont-ils + compétents que le citoyen lambda ? https://appel-de-scientifiques-contre-un-nouveau-programme-nucleaire.org/#signataires
Written by 286F677F51A9AE9BF92DFF38037D353143D78C13FDE40765A5045227D10DE95D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1701651728913879544
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1702024178935693797
- noteId - 1702024178935693797
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 286F677F51A9AE9BF92DFF38037D353143D78C13FDE40765A5045227D10DE95D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1694629160995
- tweetId - 1701651728913879544
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- L'article de Ouest-France ne donne la parole qu'aux anti- nucléaire ayant signé l'appel. Il serait bon de donner la parole aux pro. En quoi un Ingénieur forestier, un agronome, un sociologue ou un médecin, signataires de cet appel sont-ils + compétents que le citoyen lambda ? https://appel-de-scientifiques-contre-un-nouveau-programme-nucleaire.org/#signataires
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-09-13 18:19:20 UTC (1694629160995) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-15 01:40:54 UTC (1694742054714) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-09-13 16:44:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-13 15:46:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-13 15:35:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-13 15:22:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-13 14:45:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-13 14:01:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-13 13:52:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-13 13:41:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-14 16:30:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-14 16:30:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-14 12:34:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-14 10:50:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-14 08:41:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-13 23:54:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-13 23:44:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-13 20:56:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 12:43:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 08:46:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 08:40:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 08:39:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 03:23:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 00:57:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-14 21:31:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-15 20:18:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-18 06:31:28 -0500 | Rating Details |