Birdwatch Note
2023-09-12 13:35:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
No aporta evidencia de que “la mayoría de magistrados se decide por la no revisión de la pena”. Como mínimo debería indicar que se refiere a todas las peticiones de revisión de pena, lo que no implica que esas peticiones estuvieran fundamentadas en la rebaja de penas de la Ley. https://www.poderjudicial.es/cgpj/es/Poder-Judicial/En-Portada/Los-tribunales-han-acordado-1-155-reducciones-de-pena-en-aplicacion-de-la-Ley-Organica-10-2022
Written by 152D2659531C3FFDFEE37DF4205DDBDF10F894D1027FAB1097A5DC4C76455F5D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1701567535840194661
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1701590236273476075
- noteId - 1701590236273476075
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 152D2659531C3FFDFEE37DF4205DDBDF10F894D1027FAB1097A5DC4C76455F5D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1694525701002
- tweetId - 1701567535840194661
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- No aporta evidencia de que “la mayoría de magistrados se decide por la no revisión de la pena”. Como mínimo debería indicar que se refiere a todas las peticiones de revisión de pena, lo que no implica que esas peticiones estuvieran fundamentadas en la rebaja de penas de la Ley. https://www.poderjudicial.es/cgpj/es/Poder-Judicial/En-Portada/Los-tribunales-han-acordado-1-155-reducciones-de-pena-en-aplicacion-de-la-Ley-Organica-10-2022
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-09-12 13:35:01 UTC (1694525701002) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-13 02:39:35 UTC (1694572775967) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-09-12 17:05:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 16:46:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 16:38:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 16:33:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 16:09:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 16:03:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 15:57:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 15:34:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 15:32:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 15:20:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 15:12:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 15:07:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 12:56:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 11:35:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 11:07:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 11:06:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 10:23:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-12 09:20:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-13 14:52:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-13 13:22:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-13 08:32:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-13 05:57:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-13 05:26:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-13 04:55:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-13 02:50:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-13 00:54:58 -0500 | Rating Details |