Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-09 06:26:30 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

@NiranelArt has confirmed that they made the artwork. https://twitter.com/NiranelArt/status/1700147316517110183 If you want to argue about ownership of AI art that's fine, but it should be kept to the replies. No US/international court or organisation has weighed in on this topic yet. As such, this is a purely subjective debate.

Written by 004DEFA0383DD75D5CD8B1E2ED4D869816093E6020324F03C6CEA175F6157977
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1700146976069710088

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1700395236504351148
  • noteId - 1700395236504351148
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 004DEFA0383DD75D5CD8B1E2ED4D869816093E6020324F03C6CEA175F6157977 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1694240790853
  • tweetId - 1700146976069710088
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • @NiranelArt has confirmed that they made the artwork. https://twitter.com/NiranelArt/status/1700147316517110183 If you want to argue about ownership of AI art that's fine, but it should be kept to the replies. No US/international court or organisation has weighed in on this topic yet. As such, this is a purely subjective debate.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-09 06:26:30 UTC
(1694240790853)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-10 04:39:13 UTC
(1694320753742)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-09 13:10:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 13:08:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 12:06:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 12:03:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 08:29:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 07:52:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 07:45:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 07:10:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 06:16:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-09 05:04:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 09:09:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-10 23:55:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-12 08:20:58 -0500 Rating Details