Birdwatch Note
2023-09-07 16:12:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Has all the signs of a classic grift and not one shred of evidence that it’s outrageous claim would be true.
Written by E1999B72C8D9ABB52566400255DECF8D49F866247F7741B49D848A09EDE67470
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1699777687236079858
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1699817888645837044
- noteId - 1699817888645837044
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E1999B72C8D9ABB52566400255DECF8D49F866247F7741B49D848A09EDE67470 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1694103140399
- tweetId - 1699777687236079858
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Has all the signs of a classic grift and not one shred of evidence that it’s outrageous claim would be true.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-09-07 16:12:20 UTC (1694103140399) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-08 02:42:17 UTC (1694140937491) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |