Birdwatch Note
2023-09-07 12:10:25 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The programme was unfunded beyond 2011 because it was understood that whichever party won the 2010 general election would need to hold a Spending Review afterwards. It’s misleading to say Labour planned to cut the scheme. https://x.com/jomicheii/status/1699677072753410122?s=46&t=D_tZSUChrdqBVQAqELgP4w
Written by D33298FDD81580BCD5BB5296BB7F40D122393C80120EE776E4DF3F9EBA1D487E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1699665899605684672
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1699757008809865582
- noteId - 1699757008809865582
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D33298FDD81580BCD5BB5296BB7F40D122393C80120EE776E4DF3F9EBA1D487E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1694088625516
- tweetId - 1699665899605684672
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The programme was unfunded beyond 2011 because it was understood that whichever party won the 2010 general election would need to hold a Spending Review afterwards. It’s misleading to say Labour planned to cut the scheme. https://x.com/jomicheii/status/1699677072753410122?s=46&t=D_tZSUChrdqBVQAqELgP4w
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-09-07 12:10:25 UTC (1694088625516) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-08 02:42:17 UTC (1694140937491) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-09-07 17:53:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 10:51:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 10:25:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 10:21:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 10:20:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 09:59:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 09:32:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 08:50:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 08:20:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 07:28:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 07:27:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 07:22:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 07:21:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 07:21:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-08 16:04:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-08 10:10:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-08 06:33:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-07 21:35:42 -0500 | Rating Details |