Birdwatch Note
2023-09-05 14:47:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The "Yelling fire in a theater" exception comes from the Supreme Court case Schneck v US, where it was used to ban speaking against the draft. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States This was overturned in Brandenburg v Ohio, which held that hateful speech is protected by the First Amendment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio
Written by 954A8CC66AC4FA3A4CFC033F25E15874D49823952106D4BCBD7C25BD29D964BC
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1698751789900910668
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1699071817913418121
- noteId - 1699071817913418121
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 954A8CC66AC4FA3A4CFC033F25E15874D49823952106D4BCBD7C25BD29D964BC Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1693925263278
- tweetId - 1698751789900910668
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The "Yelling fire in a theater" exception comes from the Supreme Court case Schneck v US, where it was used to ban speaking against the draft. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States This was overturned in Brandenburg v Ohio, which held that hateful speech is protected by the First Amendment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-09-05 14:47:43 UTC (1693925263278) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-09-07 02:40:10 UTC (1694054410803) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-09-06 15:45:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-06 08:02:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-06 05:39:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 17:59:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 17:49:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 16:58:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 16:42:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 16:19:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 16:05:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 13:34:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 13:34:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 12:58:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 12:43:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 12:16:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 12:15:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 12:01:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 11:46:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 11:26:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 11:16:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 10:46:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 10:31:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 10:24:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 10:21:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 10:08:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-05 09:58:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-07 17:12:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-07 05:57:57 -0500 | Rating Details |