Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-05 11:05:52 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is probably not a Challenger, but c'mon even if it was imagine them celebrating taking out 1 (one) tank. No one claimed the Western tanks were invincible, just better than the totally not invincible russian tanks

Written by 61EE96DEB446D7F5584F1A381CE8720EA5E1C4CA252C0975542470BA8BC33187
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1698874543090335841

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1699015987452911735
  • noteId - 1699015987452911735
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 61EE96DEB446D7F5584F1A381CE8720EA5E1C4CA252C0975542470BA8BC33187 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693911952259
  • tweetId - 1698874543090335841
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • This is probably not a Challenger, but c'mon even if it was imagine them celebrating taking out 1 (one) tank. No one claimed the Western tanks were invincible, just better than the totally not invincible russian tanks

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-05 11:05:52 UTC
(1693911952259)
2023-09-05 14:09:14 UTC
(1693922954299)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-09-07 02:40:10 UTC
(1694054410803)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-09-05 14:09:14 UTC
(1693922954299)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-05 17:32:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 12:06:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 08:54:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 08:50:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 08:28:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 08:16:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 07:44:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 07:40:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 07:33:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 07:25:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 07:22:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 07:15:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 07:09:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 07:08:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 06:57:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 06:28:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-15 17:50:11 -0500 Rating Details