Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-02 12:44:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

La corrupción es un delito de actividad, no de resultado. La cuestión no es si fueron beneficiados, sino si buscaban influir en los arbitrajes mediante el pago al vicepresidente del comité arbitral. Si lo consiguieron o no es secundario. El informe de la GC es claro. https://www.lasexta.com/noticias/deportes/futbol/guardia-civil-concluye-informe-que-negreira-arbitraje-espana-fue-imparcial_2023090264f301439598e30001a5230f.html

Written by 782D21DCE43754845D0F55B7D0CE8157D9C45F9694520F29364B0329A97F4548
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1697934435704852492

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1697953672733270486
  • noteId - 1697953672733270486
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 782D21DCE43754845D0F55B7D0CE8157D9C45F9694520F29364B0329A97F4548 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693658676690
  • tweetId - 1697934435704852492
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • La corrupción es un delito de actividad, no de resultado. La cuestión no es si fueron beneficiados, sino si buscaban influir en los arbitrajes mediante el pago al vicepresidente del comité arbitral. Si lo consiguieron o no es secundario. El informe de la GC es claro. https://www.lasexta.com/noticias/deportes/futbol/guardia-civil-concluye-informe-que-negreira-arbitraje-espana-fue-imparcial_2023090264f301439598e30001a5230f.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-02 12:44:36 UTC
(1693658676690)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-04 02:38:47 UTC
(1693795127504)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-02 18:02:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 13:57:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-03 04:23:02 -0500 Rating Details