Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-01 19:09:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Per the study: "The specific PP-Spike fragment was found in 50% of the biological samples analyzed, and its presence was independent of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titer." Finding *fragments* of the modified spike with a mass-spectrometer does NOT mean it is still produced. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/prca.202300048

Written by 7BF678B8E3DE3697B627C878B38EE05AD56C96706817A9F40445B8937C56EAF9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1697353695103430947

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1697688237479956890
  • noteId - 1697688237479956890
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7BF678B8E3DE3697B627C878B38EE05AD56C96706817A9F40445B8937C56EAF9 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693595391995
  • tweetId - 1697353695103430947
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Per the study: "The specific PP-Spike fragment was found in 50% of the biological samples analyzed, and its presence was independent of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titer." Finding *fragments* of the modified spike with a mass-spectrometer does NOT mean it is still produced. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/prca.202300048

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-01 19:09:51 UTC
(1693595391995)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-02 02:12:44 UTC
(1693620764138)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-01 17:56:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 17:54:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 17:39:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 17:23:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 17:16:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 16:33:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 15:26:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 16:10:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 15:57:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 10:22:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 08:21:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 07:25:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 06:43:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 06:32:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 06:17:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 05:42:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 05:11:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 05:09:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 04:38:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 03:56:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 03:44:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 00:47:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 23:41:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 22:16:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 19:36:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-03 07:21:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-03 06:32:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-03 00:18:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 13:54:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 13:40:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 13:34:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-05 11:04:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-25 11:33:50 -0600 Rating Details
2024-06-08 13:32:26 -0500 Rating Details