Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-01 06:11:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Washington Post generally rates politicians' statements with a system of Pinocchios. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/01/07/about-fact-checker/ They aggregated several of Biden's repeated fabrications in one article to soften criticism and reduce statistical comparisons in the upcoming Presidential election.

Written by 5F3F15B8691C41AD4D9BBF0021077DEA0747330B5E8A38FF87D156E1999326FC
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1697229552269795662

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1697492429904179462
  • noteId - 1697492429904179462
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5F3F15B8691C41AD4D9BBF0021077DEA0747330B5E8A38FF87D156E1999326FC Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693548707831
  • tweetId - 1697229552269795662
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Washington Post generally rates politicians' statements with a system of Pinocchios. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/01/07/about-fact-checker/ They aggregated several of Biden's repeated fabrications in one article to soften criticism and reduce statistical comparisons in the upcoming Presidential election.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-01 06:11:47 UTC
(1693548707831)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-02 02:12:44 UTC
(1693620764138)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-01 12:32:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 10:41:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 09:24:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 07:28:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 07:25:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 05:58:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 05:35:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 05:32:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 05:24:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 03:34:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 03:07:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 01:16:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 11:56:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 01:47:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-03 11:33:29 -0500 Rating Details