Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-31 14:59:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Numbers in the chart are in nominal terms, instead of relative terms (regarding the number of inhabitants per country). In relative terms, Poland and Bulgaria for example, are using much more coal than Germany. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_countries_by_population

Written by 3956048DE4C27D3A264C4DE83C6620D3FFAAF93C85393DCAE8D2E366313DE46B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1697146465271853498

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1697262898538836246
  • noteId - 1697262898538836246
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3956048DE4C27D3A264C4DE83C6620D3FFAAF93C85393DCAE8D2E366313DE46B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693493983288
  • tweetId - 1697146465271853498
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Numbers in the chart are in nominal terms, instead of relative terms (regarding the number of inhabitants per country). In relative terms, Poland and Bulgaria for example, are using much more coal than Germany. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_countries_by_population

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-31 14:59:43 UTC
(1693493983288)
2023-08-31 21:13:23 UTC
(1693516403779)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-09-01 02:41:20 UTC
(1693536080941)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-08-31 21:13:23 UTC
(1693516403779)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-31 16:20:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 15:21:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 14:41:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 12:53:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 11:51:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:54:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:53:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:46:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:21:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:06:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:03:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:03:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:02:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 04:31:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 03:51:02 -0500 Rating Details