Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-31 13:22:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Sur les 28 mises en demeure prononcées par l'Arcom du 01/03/2022 au 26/07/2023, 8 concernent les chaines Cnews et C8, soit 25%. Un biais de sélection semble bien exister. https://www.arcom.fr/nos-ressources/espace-juridique/decisions?field_type_de_decision_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_prise_en_region_value=All&sort_bef_combine=field_date_de_decision_value_DESC&sort_by=field_date_de_decision_value&sort_order=DESC&page=0

Written by 885746DFE3BB34258CD365F02B1A6FFC06E8958079885FBADC4DA572D1174154
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1697207317857505723

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1697238378721456609
  • noteId - 1697238378721456609
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 885746DFE3BB34258CD365F02B1A6FFC06E8958079885FBADC4DA572D1174154 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693488137307
  • tweetId - 1697207317857505723
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Sur les 28 mises en demeure prononcées par l'Arcom du 01/03/2022 au 26/07/2023, 8 concernent les chaines Cnews et C8, soit 25%. Un biais de sélection semble bien exister. https://www.arcom.fr/nos-ressources/espace-juridique/decisions?field_type_de_decision_target_id%5B11%5D=11&field_prise_en_region_value=All&sort_bef_combine=field_date_de_decision_value_DESC&sort_by=field_date_de_decision_value&sort_order=DESC&page=0

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-31 13:22:17 UTC
(1693488137307)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-01 02:41:20 UTC
(1693536080941)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-31 16:44:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 16:17:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 16:03:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 14:54:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 14:15:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 13:55:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 13:12:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 12:01:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 11:56:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:55:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:45:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 10:43:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 09:32:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 09:25:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 09:22:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 09:03:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 05:32:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 05:11:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 05:09:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 04:26:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 02:43:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-01 01:24:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 20:12:47 -0500 Rating Details