Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-29 17:28:00 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Using percentages in °C or °F is nonsensical, because the zero-point is arbitrary in both scales. We have to use an absolute scale like Kelvin. E.g.: What is the energy increase from 1°C to 2°C? The numeral suggests the answer is 200% (double), but it's actually less than 0.4%. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin

Written by E6A45A7520FD65CB25777C6F59B7EEA4F36607C2244B327E35330A126CBD8ACE
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1696196302856495376

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1696575439597170961
  • noteId - 1696575439597170961
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E6A45A7520FD65CB25777C6F59B7EEA4F36607C2244B327E35330A126CBD8ACE Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693330080302
  • tweetId - 1696196302856495376
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Using percentages in °C or °F is nonsensical, because the zero-point is arbitrary in both scales. We have to use an absolute scale like Kelvin. E.g.: What is the energy increase from 1°C to 2°C? The numeral suggests the answer is 200% (double), but it's actually less than 0.4%. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-29 17:28:00 UTC
(1693330080302)
2023-08-29 20:10:15 UTC
(1693339815366)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-08-30 02:41:19 UTC
(1693363279333)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2023-08-29 20:10:15 UTC
(1693339815366)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-29 18:46:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 18:41:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 16:23:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 16:00:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 15:53:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 15:26:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 15:23:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:48:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:40:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:27:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:03:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:41:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:18:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:17:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:09:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:07:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:54:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:52:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:51:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:51:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:48:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:40:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:34:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-30 08:47:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-30 06:38:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-30 01:21:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-30 00:36:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 23:30:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 22:32:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 20:04:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 17:34:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 10:30:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-02-29 04:31:13 -0600 Rating Details