Birdwatch Note
2023-08-29 17:28:00 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Using percentages in °C or °F is nonsensical, because the zero-point is arbitrary in both scales. We have to use an absolute scale like Kelvin. E.g.: What is the energy increase from 1°C to 2°C? The numeral suggests the answer is 200% (double), but it's actually less than 0.4%. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin
Written by E6A45A7520FD65CB25777C6F59B7EEA4F36607C2244B327E35330A126CBD8ACE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1696196302856495376
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1696575439597170961
- noteId - 1696575439597170961
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E6A45A7520FD65CB25777C6F59B7EEA4F36607C2244B327E35330A126CBD8ACE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1693330080302
- tweetId - 1696196302856495376
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Using percentages in °C or °F is nonsensical, because the zero-point is arbitrary in both scales. We have to use an absolute scale like Kelvin. E.g.: What is the energy increase from 1°C to 2°C? The numeral suggests the answer is 200% (double), but it's actually less than 0.4%. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-29 17:28:00 UTC (1693330080302) |
2023-08-29 20:10:15 UTC (1693339815366) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2023-08-30 02:41:19 UTC (1693363279333) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 2023-08-29 20:10:15 UTC (1693339815366) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-29 18:46:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 18:41:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 16:23:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 16:00:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 15:53:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 15:26:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 15:23:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:48:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:40:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:27:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:03:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:41:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:18:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:17:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:09:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:07:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:54:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:52:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:51:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:51:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:48:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:40:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:34:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-30 08:47:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-30 06:38:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-30 01:21:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-30 00:36:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 23:30:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 22:32:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 20:04:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-02 17:34:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-02 10:30:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-29 04:31:13 -0600 | Rating Details |