Birdwatch Note
2023-08-29 16:33:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Biden was referring to the Civil Rights Act of 1991, where both had been Senators for decades. Strom Thrumond would have been considered one of the most likely to vote nay along with a small handful of other Republicans, due to his strong history of opposing civil rights. https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/longest-filibuster-strom-thurmond https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1021/vote_102_1_00238.htm https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/strom_thurmond/300157
Written by 45C9039BE4724A42A8B4A057F3D3CA46D0CDA2B2E3CC5567F355CE36181F06A3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1696551343744283068
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1696561684993789992
- noteId - 1696561684993789992
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 45C9039BE4724A42A8B4A057F3D3CA46D0CDA2B2E3CC5567F355CE36181F06A3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1693326800951
- tweetId - 1696551343744283068
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Biden was referring to the Civil Rights Act of 1991, where both had been Senators for decades. Strom Thrumond would have been considered one of the most likely to vote nay along with a small handful of other Republicans, due to his strong history of opposing civil rights. https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/longest-filibuster-strom-thurmond https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1021/vote_102_1_00238.htm https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/strom_thurmond/300157
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-29 16:33:20 UTC (1693326800951) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-30 02:41:19 UTC (1693363279333) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-29 16:04:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 15:24:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:47:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:41:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:40:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:35:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:24:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:24:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:23:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:20:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:20:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:18:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 14:15:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:49:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:45:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:32:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:31:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:16:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:16:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 13:07:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:39:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:33:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:18:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:10:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:07:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 12:07:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 11:58:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 11:56:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 11:54:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 11:50:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 11:49:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 11:48:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 11:45:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 11:43:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 22:24:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-31 12:16:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-31 07:07:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-31 21:45:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-02 08:28:58 -0500 | Rating Details |