Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-29 16:33:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Biden was referring to the Civil Rights Act of 1991, where both had been Senators for decades. Strom Thrumond would have been considered one of the most likely to vote nay along with a small handful of other Republicans, due to his strong history of opposing civil rights. https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/longest-filibuster-strom-thurmond https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1021/vote_102_1_00238.htm https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/strom_thurmond/300157

Written by 45C9039BE4724A42A8B4A057F3D3CA46D0CDA2B2E3CC5567F355CE36181F06A3
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1696551343744283068

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1696561684993789992
  • noteId - 1696561684993789992
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 45C9039BE4724A42A8B4A057F3D3CA46D0CDA2B2E3CC5567F355CE36181F06A3 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693326800951
  • tweetId - 1696551343744283068
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Biden was referring to the Civil Rights Act of 1991, where both had been Senators for decades. Strom Thrumond would have been considered one of the most likely to vote nay along with a small handful of other Republicans, due to his strong history of opposing civil rights. https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/longest-filibuster-strom-thurmond https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1021/vote_102_1_00238.htm https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/strom_thurmond/300157

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-29 16:33:20 UTC
(1693326800951)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-30 02:41:19 UTC
(1693363279333)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-29 16:04:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 15:24:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:47:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:41:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:40:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:35:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:24:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:24:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:23:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:20:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:20:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:18:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 14:15:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:49:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:45:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:32:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:31:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:16:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:16:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 13:07:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:39:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:33:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:18:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:10:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:07:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 12:07:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:58:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:56:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:54:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:50:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:49:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:48:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:45:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 11:43:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 22:24:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 12:16:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 07:07:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-31 21:45:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-02 08:28:58 -0500 Rating Details