Birdwatch Note
2023-08-29 06:15:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
These bullets did collide but not mid-air as is sometimes suggested. One of them was never even fired, it has no "rifling" marks. So it was stationary, perhaps carried in a clip, bandolier or just in an ammo crate, when it was struck. Not extremely rare. https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/09/fact-check-viral-image-does-not-show-two-bullets-that-collided-during-the-battle-of-gallipoli.html https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015/05/04/bullets-collided-mid-air/ https://thefunnybeaver.com/did-these-two-bullets-collide-midair/ https://www.greatwarforum.org/topic/229997-photo-of-two-bullets-collided-mid-air/
Written by 0657F2B4B95F9116FFB1F6671842C215E1D2E2B5081B1E6AB4F4F2D362E82255
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1696292913058058405
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1696406208108720188
- noteId - 1696406208108720188
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0657F2B4B95F9116FFB1F6671842C215E1D2E2B5081B1E6AB4F4F2D362E82255 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1693289732373
- tweetId - 1696292913058058405
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- These bullets did collide but not mid-air as is sometimes suggested. One of them was never even fired, it has no "rifling" marks. So it was stationary, perhaps carried in a clip, bandolier or just in an ammo crate, when it was struck. Not extremely rare. https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/09/fact-check-viral-image-does-not-show-two-bullets-that-collided-during-the-battle-of-gallipoli.html https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015/05/04/bullets-collided-mid-air/ https://thefunnybeaver.com/did-these-two-bullets-collide-midair/ https://www.greatwarforum.org/topic/229997-photo-of-two-bullets-collided-mid-air/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-08-29 06:15:32 UTC (1693289732373) |
2023-08-29 09:10:38 UTC (1693300238180) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-08-30 02:41:19 UTC (1693363279333) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-08-29 09:10:38 UTC (1693300238180) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-08-29 15:00:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 09:00:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 06:24:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 06:11:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 05:52:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 05:23:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 04:41:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 04:14:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 04:12:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 04:09:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 04:05:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 03:53:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 03:39:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 03:38:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 03:05:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:52:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:47:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:36:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:33:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:27:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:26:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:22:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:19:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:17:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:15:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:14:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:09:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 02:06:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:59:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:55:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:49:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:49:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:47:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:44:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:39:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:37:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:33:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:29:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:26:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-29 01:24:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-30 23:53:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-04 16:27:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-04 15:28:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-04 15:17:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-04 11:52:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-09-10 14:11:01 -0500 | Rating Details |