Birdwatch Note
2023-08-29 05:02:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
It's clear to see from the cut of the sleeves on the shirts that she is wearing that the sleeves are the feminine cut, not the boy cut that he is wearing. Therefore, it's not inconceivable to think that she would want to wear a matching shirt with him but not wear his clothes.
Written by BF3529EFCC6EF018F3FD6730900791F8ED5007F2668CDA8C476F7F43DD135E6A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1696148520279920960
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1696387821114675687
- noteId - 1696387821114675687
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BF3529EFCC6EF018F3FD6730900791F8ED5007F2668CDA8C476F7F43DD135E6A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1693285348573
- tweetId - 1696148520279920960
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- It's clear to see from the cut of the sleeves on the shirts that she is wearing that the sleeves are the feminine cut, not the boy cut that he is wearing. Therefore, it's not inconceivable to think that she would want to wear a matching shirt with him but not wear his clothes.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-29 05:02:28 UTC (1693285348573) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-30 02:41:19 UTC (1693363279333) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-08-29 09:56:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 08:32:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 07:52:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 07:31:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 07:09:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 06:57:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 05:56:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 05:22:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 04:55:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 04:55:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 04:26:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 04:17:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 04:13:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 04:09:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 04:09:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 04:02:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 04:02:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 03:53:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 03:19:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 03:13:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 02:58:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 02:42:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 02:15:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 02:13:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 02:07:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 02:05:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 01:41:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 01:31:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 01:22:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 01:11:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 01:07:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 00:44:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 00:41:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-29 00:24:33 -0500 | Rating Details |