Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-28 20:13:23 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Proposed CN is misleading as it suggests that all superior court appointments were engaging in these events. Not all of the other 1,302 judges appointed by the LPC are lower level judges. https://www.fja.gc.ca/appointments-nominations/judges-juges-eng.aspx OP is posting an opinion about the National Post's intent. NNN.

Written by BB34D73492ED986AB8F8F3DE63C0FEF7FDD7A358BE5BD96F6EEB5D86D665BE9D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1696185693108687091

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1696254673270030530
  • noteId - 1696254673270030530
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BB34D73492ED986AB8F8F3DE63C0FEF7FDD7A358BE5BD96F6EEB5D86D665BE9D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693253603653
  • tweetId - 1696185693108687091
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Proposed CN is misleading as it suggests that all superior court appointments were engaging in these events. Not all of the other 1,302 judges appointed by the LPC are lower level judges. https://www.fja.gc.ca/appointments-nominations/judges-juges-eng.aspx OP is posting an opinion about the National Post's intent. NNN.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-28 20:13:23 UTC
(1693253603653)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-29 02:11:18 UTC
(1693275078609)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-28 17:50:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 16:49:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 16:15:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 16:14:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 16:05:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 15:19:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 17:15:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 15:12:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 08:44:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 07:27:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 20:52:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 20:16:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 19:59:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-02-28 09:09:02 -0600 Rating Details