Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-28 15:49:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It is worth noting the following; The Court of Appeal says the case was not about recognising Ivermectin as an alternative remedy for the treatment of Covid-19. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2023/08/25/doctors-may-dispense-ivermectin-to-patients-appellate-court-rules/

Written by 4089C6039C417BBE5C87EBD7D24E97A2F11AC887FA375C8BC5F74BE2BCDC2264
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1695058083867705606

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1696188260094021749
  • noteId - 1696188260094021749
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4089C6039C417BBE5C87EBD7D24E97A2F11AC887FA375C8BC5F74BE2BCDC2264 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693237769519
  • tweetId - 1695058083867705606
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It is worth noting the following; The Court of Appeal says the case was not about recognising Ivermectin as an alternative remedy for the treatment of Covid-19. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2023/08/25/doctors-may-dispense-ivermectin-to-patients-appellate-court-rules/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-28 15:49:29 UTC
(1693237769519)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-29 02:11:18 UTC
(1693275078609)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-28 17:20:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 11:28:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 11:02:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 10:56:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 10:20:26 -0500 Rating Details