Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-27 15:13:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

This should be seen as a personal opinion. If the election was "stolen", it would be highly likely that the sources cited here (on CN) are not reliable. When Trump won the 2016 election, people also were whining that there were manipulations. This discussion is futile. NNN

Written by 37BC819703E633DE405E9A0551A8798FAED87E6CA71173B8B943067ABAC86867
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1695770642971279709

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1695816849714184612
  • noteId - 1695816849714184612
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 37BC819703E633DE405E9A0551A8798FAED87E6CA71173B8B943067ABAC86867 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693149218381
  • tweetId - 1695770642971279709
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • This should be seen as a personal opinion. If the election was "stolen", it would be highly likely that the sources cited here (on CN) are not reliable. When Trump won the 2016 election, people also were whining that there were manipulations. This discussion is futile. NNN

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-27 15:13:38 UTC
(1693149218381)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-28 02:39:05 UTC
(1693190345211)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-27 18:06:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 16:33:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 14:44:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 12:08:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 12:04:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 12:03:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 12:00:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:57:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:47:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:39:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:39:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:36:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:19:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:17:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:13:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:11:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:07:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:05:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 11:03:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:59:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:56:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:45:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:35:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:28:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:24:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:24:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:20:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:16:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 08:46:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 22:39:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 20:53:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-29 01:31:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-06 19:56:59 -0500 Rating Details