Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-27 15:12:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Planting trees was never part of the original Science study this post is based on. The Science study states that carbon credits are based on reducing deforestation, but the study found that deforestation was not significantly reduced by these programs. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade3535

Written by 6BB29F3A2D52AAC61AAB7C7E037C26EE4E04582F205D78AC6060F00D1E69543E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1695481122040492354

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1695816646114652298
  • noteId - 1695816646114652298
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6BB29F3A2D52AAC61AAB7C7E037C26EE4E04582F205D78AC6060F00D1E69543E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693149169842
  • tweetId - 1695481122040492354
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Planting trees was never part of the original Science study this post is based on. The Science study states that carbon credits are based on reducing deforestation, but the study found that deforestation was not significantly reduced by these programs. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade3535

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-27 15:12:49 UTC
(1693149169842)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-28 02:39:05 UTC
(1693190345211)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-27 11:59:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:33:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:28:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:20:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 10:20:10 -0500 Rating Details