Birdwatch Note
2023-08-27 01:18:40 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
NNN, due to the "test" it was obviously a test rather than a feature. Furthermore, the post was true at the time.
Written by 32B19B13F639D8DA91AD2016391739D482EA9390B5A3AC7F4488405BC0467330
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1695151548190318805
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1695606725078851804
- noteId - 1695606725078851804
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 32B19B13F639D8DA91AD2016391739D482EA9390B5A3AC7F4488405BC0467330 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1693099120765
- tweetId - 1695151548190318805
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN, due to the "test" it was obviously a test rather than a feature. Furthermore, the post was true at the time.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-27 01:18:40 UTC (1693099120765) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-28 02:39:05 UTC (1693190345211) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |