Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-26 22:10:07 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN, the current note is a disgrace. The tweet even says beta. The rest is opinion.

Written by BE8064D7A86170461547E60684A593DBE6105492D40D68CAA87FC90B49B0075A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1695268712910348471

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1695559272103366788
  • noteId - 1695559272103366788
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BE8064D7A86170461547E60684A593DBE6105492D40D68CAA87FC90B49B0075A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693087807095
  • tweetId - 1695268712910348471
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN, the current note is a disgrace. The tweet even says beta. The rest is opinion.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-26 22:10:07 UTC
(1693087807095)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-27 02:42:19 UTC
(1693104139456)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-26 17:38:56 -0500 Rating Details