Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-26 12:59:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

福島第一原発のALPS処理水の安全性に関しては、韓国や中国の科学者が安全性を公表しています https://jp.yna.co.kr/view/AJP20230517002500882 https://www.chosunonline.com/site/data/html_dir/2023/06/21/2023062180034.html https://www.chosunonline.com/site/data/html_dir/2023/08/23/2023082380040.html 政治的な土台が異なる複数国の検証結果が同じ内容になると云う事はプロパガンダとは呼べないと考えるのが適切です

Written by 4DEA6BB149562D056364B950EF382583187B5A3F6799BD0B2F34750B0BFCEE11
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1695185767939940651

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1695420727086989452
  • noteId - 1695420727086989452
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4DEA6BB149562D056364B950EF382583187B5A3F6799BD0B2F34750B0BFCEE11 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693054775387
  • tweetId - 1695185767939940651
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • 福島第一原発のALPS処理水の安全性に関しては、韓国や中国の科学者が安全性を公表しています https://jp.yna.co.kr/view/AJP20230517002500882 https://www.chosunonline.com/site/data/html_dir/2023/06/21/2023062180034.html https://www.chosunonline.com/site/data/html_dir/2023/08/23/2023082380040.html 政治的な土台が異なる複数国の検証結果が同じ内容になると云う事はプロパガンダとは呼べないと考えるのが適切です

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-26 12:59:35 UTC
(1693054775387)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-27 02:42:19 UTC
(1693104139456)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-26 18:08:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 16:19:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 12:22:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 11:30:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 11:27:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 10:32:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 10:18:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 09:34:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 08:48:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 08:45:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 08:30:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 08:24:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 08:12:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-26 08:01:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 12:19:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-27 02:01:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-28 00:43:30 -0500 Rating Details