Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-24 18:14:54 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The "fact check" on abortion attempts to redirect to rarity of late-term abortions rather than whether Democrats support unrestricted abortion as a matter of policy- which they do. 218 House Democrats and 46 Senate Democrats voted for such a bill in 2021. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1172/vote_117_2_00065.htm

Written by 530FC2235B7AAAF7E1BC1AF57187D05FAF7F9D315803119771AEB84D8550F56E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1694770592010940738

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1694775303564919284
  • noteId - 1694775303564919284
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 530FC2235B7AAAF7E1BC1AF57187D05FAF7F9D315803119771AEB84D8550F56E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692900894428
  • tweetId - 1694770592010940738
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The "fact check" on abortion attempts to redirect to rarity of late-term abortions rather than whether Democrats support unrestricted abortion as a matter of policy- which they do. 218 House Democrats and 46 Senate Democrats voted for such a bill in 2021. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1172/vote_117_2_00065.htm

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-24 18:14:54 UTC
(1692900894428)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-25 03:41:06 UTC
(1692934866410)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-24 19:07:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 18:41:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 17:38:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 17:12:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 15:03:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 14:46:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 14:40:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 14:22:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:57:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:51:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:33:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:31:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:30:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:29:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:28:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:26:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:25:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:22:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 13:18:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-25 13:29:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-25 13:01:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-25 10:42:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-25 06:33:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-25 06:09:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-25 05:17:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-25 05:16:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 21:17:46 -0500 Rating Details