Birdwatch Note
2023-08-24 07:18:06 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
No, no. They do not ban people for this, It's just a tactic used to artificially drive up engagement.
Written by 7E69B45D63C9B44EA1B0442430B33D82CA6CE7746C3D3E25E590C91A4FDC1355
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1694378200883667028
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1694610016043483606
- noteId - 1694610016043483606
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7E69B45D63C9B44EA1B0442430B33D82CA6CE7746C3D3E25E590C91A4FDC1355 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1692861486814
- tweetId - 1694378200883667028
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- No, no. They do not ban people for this, It's just a tactic used to artificially drive up engagement.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-24 07:18:06 UTC (1692861486814) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-25 03:41:06 UTC (1692934866410) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |