Birdwatch Note
2023-08-24 06:30:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The claim that the government is blocked is factually correct. Maugham is a known legal activist so unreliable as an impartial source. The Twitter post cited only shows a letter that refers to an “agreement”, not an “instruction”. Disagreement should go in comments. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/government-bid-overrule-ulez-expansion-would-be-blocked-courts-sadiq-khan-67j7tm8g3 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12434669/amp/Rishi-Sunak-blocked-overruling-Sadiq-Khans-ULEZ-expansion-nightmare-Government-lawyers-tell-No10-bid-thwart-Greater-London-charge-fail-courts.html
Written by 61C76868FDB5ADA45C0EB3B2D14716D58303FA98D74B93AE0BFEDC3E2AB62F73
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1694254922626183194
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1694598118652711180
- noteId - 1694598118652711180
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 61C76868FDB5ADA45C0EB3B2D14716D58303FA98D74B93AE0BFEDC3E2AB62F73 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1692858650255
- tweetId - 1694254922626183194
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. The claim that the government is blocked is factually correct. Maugham is a known legal activist so unreliable as an impartial source. The Twitter post cited only shows a letter that refers to an “agreement”, not an “instruction”. Disagreement should go in comments. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/government-bid-overrule-ulez-expansion-would-be-blocked-courts-sadiq-khan-67j7tm8g3 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12434669/amp/Rishi-Sunak-blocked-overruling-Sadiq-Khans-ULEZ-expansion-nightmare-Government-lawyers-tell-No10-bid-thwart-Greater-London-charge-fail-courts.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-24 06:30:50 UTC (1692858650255) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-25 03:41:06 UTC (1692934866410) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-08-24 06:13:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-24 03:51:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-24 03:38:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-24 01:38:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-25 08:50:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-25 02:24:32 -0500 | Rating Details |