Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-23 20:35:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

La votación no fue por la derogación de la actual Ley de Alquileres, sino de la reforma de dos articulos puntual. Hace alusión falsa de la postura de LLA ante esta ley. https://www.infobae.com/politica/2023/08/23/ley-de-alquileres-con-los-votos-justos-juntos-por-el-cambio-negocia-modificaciones-para-poder-aprobar-su-proyecto/

Written by 19EB42AF57915AC23380883C02DC4DB502133E0423E3630AD0D292CA75076995
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1694420031717741015

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1694448263322120684
  • noteId - 1694448263322120684
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 19EB42AF57915AC23380883C02DC4DB502133E0423E3630AD0D292CA75076995 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692822921962
  • tweetId - 1694420031717741015
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • La votación no fue por la derogación de la actual Ley de Alquileres, sino de la reforma de dos articulos puntual. Hace alusión falsa de la postura de LLA ante esta ley. https://www.infobae.com/politica/2023/08/23/ley-de-alquileres-con-los-votos-justos-juntos-por-el-cambio-negocia-modificaciones-para-poder-aprobar-su-proyecto/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-23 20:35:21 UTC
(1692822921962)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-24 02:42:26 UTC
(1692844946941)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-23 17:51:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 17:23:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 16:59:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 16:43:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 16:31:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 15:54:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 15:52:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 15:49:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 15:47:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 15:44:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 15:43:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 11:38:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 08:42:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 06:33:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-24 00:33:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 22:35:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 22:28:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 20:00:33 -0500 Rating Details