Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-22 15:53:06 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It is not the police who decide whether to charge or prosecute. This is the job of the CPS, who have a set of guidelines and procedures they have to follow. https://www.cps.gov.uk/how-cps-charges-and-prosecutes-rape-cases#:~:text=Rape%20is%20so%20serious%20that,be%20supported%20by%20clear%20reasons.

Written by 816CE07BA81C568B07F04C23726C2EC40DE595D5A068E584DB5F025C72171FF7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1693693403765018675

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1694014842024153352
  • noteId - 1694014842024153352
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 816CE07BA81C568B07F04C23726C2EC40DE595D5A068E584DB5F025C72171FF7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692719586267
  • tweetId - 1693693403765018675
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It is not the police who decide whether to charge or prosecute. This is the job of the CPS, who have a set of guidelines and procedures they have to follow. https://www.cps.gov.uk/how-cps-charges-and-prosecutes-rape-cases#:~:text=Rape%20is%20so%20serious%20that,be%20supported%20by%20clear%20reasons.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-22 15:53:06 UTC
(1692719586267)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-23 01:08:27 UTC
(1692752907711)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-22 18:05:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 16:33:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 16:27:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 16:23:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 16:22:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 16:04:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 16:02:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 15:58:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 15:58:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 15:49:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 15:45:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 15:44:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 15:40:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 15:30:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 15:09:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 12:37:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 12:27:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 12:07:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 12:01:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 11:47:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 11:41:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 11:23:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 11:06:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 12:06:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 07:40:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 07:33:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 05:32:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 04:51:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 03:49:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 03:32:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 00:26:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 22:08:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 19:38:34 -0500 Rating Details