Birdwatch Note
2023-08-22 12:40:03 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Regardless of whether or not she is lesbian, it's a fair assumption to make solely off of the video. The tweet is asking a question and using a video to further demonstrate what he's referring to. As the video shows an /apparently/ gay couple, there's nothing wrong with its use
Written by 031A0BEC2DFAC38AF5E1023F7D21FF7C0F5D4D83746E13ECA641668798BEE2F7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1693699565084348689
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1693966260382421163
- noteId - 1693966260382421163
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 031A0BEC2DFAC38AF5E1023F7D21FF7C0F5D4D83746E13ECA641668798BEE2F7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1692708003508
- tweetId - 1693699565084348689
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Regardless of whether or not she is lesbian, it's a fair assumption to make solely off of the video. The tweet is asking a question and using a video to further demonstrate what he's referring to. As the video shows an /apparently/ gay couple, there's nothing wrong with its use
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-22 12:40:03 UTC (1692708003508) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-23 01:08:27 UTC (1692752907711) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-08-22 16:56:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 16:55:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 16:30:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 14:19:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 14:00:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 13:37:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 13:27:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 12:26:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 12:09:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 11:36:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 11:19:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 10:30:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 09:25:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 08:33:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 08:28:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 08:06:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 07:53:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 07:42:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 07:41:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 23:12:21 -0500 | Rating Details |