Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-22 10:10:00 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

L'AIEA conclut à un impact sur l'environnement et la population négligeable https://www.iaea.org/fr/newscenter/pressreleases/laiea-conclut-que-le-plan-du-japon-de-rejet-en-mer-de-leau-traitee-a-fukushima-satisfait-aux-normes-internationales-de-surete L'usine de La Hague en France rejette 13x plus de tritium https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discharge_of_radioactive_water_of_the_Fukushima_Daiichi_Nuclear_Power_Plant#Comparison_to_other_nuclear_facilities Il existe tout de même une opposition dans la communauté scientifique (manque d'études, mesures incorrectes, alternatives non explorées) https://www.naml.org/policy/documents/2022-12-12%20Position%20Paper,%20Release%20of%20Radioactively%20Contaminated%20Water%20into%20the%20Ocean.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/despite-opposition-japan-may-soon-dump-fukushima-wastewater-pacific

Written by 9B501FE36F642122EBEADCCB13E5332E3E597FD3FDCF7932ABACE082886D07CD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1693909347410035057

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1693928497910071308
  • noteId - 1693928497910071308
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9B501FE36F642122EBEADCCB13E5332E3E597FD3FDCF7932ABACE082886D07CD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1692699000232
  • tweetId - 1693909347410035057
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • L'AIEA conclut à un impact sur l'environnement et la population négligeable https://www.iaea.org/fr/newscenter/pressreleases/laiea-conclut-que-le-plan-du-japon-de-rejet-en-mer-de-leau-traitee-a-fukushima-satisfait-aux-normes-internationales-de-surete L'usine de La Hague en France rejette 13x plus de tritium https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discharge_of_radioactive_water_of_the_Fukushima_Daiichi_Nuclear_Power_Plant#Comparison_to_other_nuclear_facilities Il existe tout de même une opposition dans la communauté scientifique (manque d'études, mesures incorrectes, alternatives non explorées) https://www.naml.org/policy/documents/2022-12-12%20Position%20Paper,%20Release%20of%20Radioactively%20Contaminated%20Water%20into%20the%20Ocean.pdf https://www.science.org/content/article/despite-opposition-japan-may-soon-dump-fukushima-wastewater-pacific

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-22 10:10:00 UTC
(1692699000232)
2023-08-22 13:10:23 UTC
(1692709823439)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-08-23 01:08:27 UTC
(1692752907711)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-08-22 13:10:23 UTC
(1692709823439)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-22 12:56:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 10:52:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 07:01:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 06:31:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 06:13:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 05:52:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 05:45:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-22 05:40:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 06:33:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 04:42:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-23 03:49:07 -0500 Rating Details