Birdwatch Note
2023-08-20 20:41:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The accepted note shows misleading information. It's unclear what the user is referring to, but while the Louvre IS NOT a private corporation that doesn't mean it has not capitalist interests. Also there's controversy around imperialist practices with clear evidence en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_capitalism en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louvre#Controversy
Written by 7F11CDC782C2DFD3B39D8BCAAA1717D0CAAC14151D9CD5C69EF357EA1092E30B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1693257643056624009
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1693362671553315208
- noteId - 1693362671553315208
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7F11CDC782C2DFD3B39D8BCAAA1717D0CAAC14151D9CD5C69EF357EA1092E30B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1692564096713
- tweetId - 1693257643056624009
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The accepted note shows misleading information. It's unclear what the user is referring to, but while the Louvre IS NOT a private corporation that doesn't mean it has not capitalist interests. Also there's controversy around imperialist practices with clear evidence en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_capitalism en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louvre#Controversy
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-20 20:41:36 UTC (1692564096713) |
2023-08-21 00:11:16 UTC (1692576676794) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2023-08-21 03:10:36 UTC (1692587436428) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2023-08-21 00:11:16 UTC (1692576676794) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-08-20 19:48:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 19:41:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 19:03:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 18:39:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 18:17:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 17:47:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 17:42:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 17:16:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 17:07:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 17:04:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 16:52:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 16:42:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-21 15:49:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-21 11:34:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-21 07:48:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-21 04:21:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-21 04:09:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-21 03:57:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-21 01:18:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 21:45:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 20:35:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 11:46:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-21 23:57:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-21 07:17:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 19:18:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 16:58:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 16:12:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-22 22:51:08 -0500 | Rating Details |