Birdwatch Note
2023-08-19 17:27:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
This is a personal opinion. And citing wikipedia doesn't prove anything because there are multiple articles that wikipedia has been edited by CIA/FBI computers. In the end indeed all documents where lost that could have made a case. Arguments in comments. NNN. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia-idUSN1642896020070816 https://www.rt.com/news/580735-cia-fbi-edits-wikipedia/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6947532.stm https://www.abc.net.au/news/2007-08-16/program-shows-cia-behind-wikipedia-entries/642224
Written by 7781D8EC9A7926379DBF72121B2ED307D83A81DB2334D4D1D0F2E8714C33F086
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1692908777480069490
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1692951382435704897
- noteId - 1692951382435704897
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7781D8EC9A7926379DBF72121B2ED307D83A81DB2334D4D1D0F2E8714C33F086 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1692466037739
- tweetId - 1692908777480069490
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is a personal opinion. And citing wikipedia doesn't prove anything because there are multiple articles that wikipedia has been edited by CIA/FBI computers. In the end indeed all documents where lost that could have made a case. Arguments in comments. NNN. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia-idUSN1642896020070816 https://www.rt.com/news/580735-cia-fbi-edits-wikipedia/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6947532.stm https://www.abc.net.au/news/2007-08-16/program-shows-cia-behind-wikipedia-entries/642224
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-08-19 17:27:17 UTC (1692466037739) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-08-20 02:11:21 UTC (1692497481502) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-08-19 18:39:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-19 18:06:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-19 17:41:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-19 16:52:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-19 16:49:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-19 15:33:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-19 14:03:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-19 13:34:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-19 12:43:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 07:27:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 05:10:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 01:10:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 17:59:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-20 07:00:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-19 16:43:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-19 14:55:22 -0500 | Rating Details |